The high-priced purchase of solid wood furniture is not the right one. Recently, Wuxi citizen Ms. Wang sue the owner of the furniture store, Jiang Mou and Furniture Market Co., Ltd., to the Nanchang District People’s Court of Wuxi City, requesting the two defendants to pay the return money and compensation. A total of 160,000 yuan. In August 2012, Ms. Wang came to a certain furniture market, and then purchased a series of solid wood furniture including a bed, a dressing table, a wine cabinet, a desk, a flower stand, etc., at a counter named Zhaohui Furniture, which cost RMB 80,000. In the trial, Ms. Wang said that it was based on the local reputation and influence of the furniture market to buy furniture. At that time, in the Zhaohui furniture store, she saw all the labels indicating that the main material of the furniture was ash. The auxiliary material is fir. Unexpectedly, after receiving the goods, she found that some of the cabinet doors could not be completely closed. After careful inspection, I realized that the main raw materials of these furniture were composite panels. The material of high-priced furniture was not in line with the promise. Ms. Wang felt that she had suffered consumer fraud. In January 2013, she complained to the Zhaohui Furniture Store to the Consumer Rights Protection Association. Under the mediation of Consumers Association, Ms. Wang asked Jiang to replace four large pieces of furniture such as dressing table and desk with solid wood materials, which was approved by Jiang. Both parties agreed that the above goods will be delivered before March 31 of the same year. However, since then, although Ms. Wang has rushed, Jiang still failed to deliver within the agreed time. In April 2013, Ms. Wang filed a complaint with Jiang and Furniture Market Co., Ltd. to the court for a refund and compensation. To this end, Ms. Wang also provided the court with a recent indoor air quality inspection report, in which formaldehyde and indoor total volatile organic compounds exceeded the standard, she believes that this is directly related to the quality of furniture. Furniture Market Co., Ltd. considers it to be a shopping mall and is not a provider of goods. According to the sales order of this case, it is not possible to distinguish whether the furniture is made of pure solid wood. In this case, the main body of the sales contract was Jiang, and the furniture market as the operating space renter has already fulfilled the review responsibility. Later, Ms. Wang took the initiative to withdraw the lawsuit against Furniture Market Co., Ltd. After repeated mediation by the court, Jiang and Ms. Wang finally reached an agreement. Ms. Wang returned all the purchased furniture to Jiang, and Jiang returned Ms. Wang’s furniture for 80,000 yuan and paid compensation of 20,000 yuan. The judge reminds the general public to check the quality of the goods before purchasing high-priced items. In case of quality disputes, they can promptly appeal to the Consumer Rights Protection Association, and pay attention to retain relevant evidence. If necessary, they can take legal measures to protect their rights and interests. (The characters and shops in the text are all pseudonyms)
Internally Engaged Asphalt Transfer Pump
Internally Engaged Asphalt Transfer Pump,Internally Engaged Asphalt Transfer Pump By Hand,Internally Engaged Asphalt Transfer Pump Diesel,Internally Engaged Asphalt Transfer Pump Grainger
Hengshui Yuanhan Trading Co.,Ltd , https://www.hengshuiyuanhanpump.com